From 11f3dec65d7223051d08dae5c75bd7686c1c9370 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Nadareski <mnadareski@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 21:45:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add more notes about extraction

---
 BurnOutSharp/FileType/Executable.cs | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/BurnOutSharp/FileType/Executable.cs b/BurnOutSharp/FileType/Executable.cs
index 22f8df24..a6c4b51c 100644
--- a/BurnOutSharp/FileType/Executable.cs
+++ b/BurnOutSharp/FileType/Executable.cs
@@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ namespace BurnOutSharp.FileType
             // - Everything else should be basically the same for other extractable types
             // - Which extractions to run is directly influenced by the detected protections
             // - Can this somehow delegate to the proper extractable type?
+            // - Can we have a check in Scanner that then runs all extractable implementations if the class is Executable?
+
+            // The following packers fully implement IExtractable (extract and doesn't return null)
+            // - <see cref="BinaryObjectScanner.Packer.CExe" />
+            // - <see cref="BinaryObjectScanner.Packer.EmbeddedExecutable" />
+            // - <see cref="BinaryObjectScanner.Packer.WinRARSFX" />
+            // - <see cref="BinaryObjectScanner.Packer.WinZipSFX" />
+            // - <see cref="BinaryObjectScanner.Packer.WiseInstaller" />
 
             return null;
         }