Possible false positive for Key2Audio XS on an XCP2 CD #13

Closed
opened 2026-01-29 21:04:55 +00:00 by claunia · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @TheRogueArchivist on GitHub (Oct 27, 2020).

Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub.

On a CD confirmed to have XCP2, BOS detects some files as Key2Audio XS, which I would consider to be very unlikely to be on the same CD. The suspected false positives are:
E:\BIN\WIN32\SDKHM.DLL: Key2Audio XS
E:\BIN\WIN32\SDKHM.EXE: Key2Audio XS

Originally created by @TheRogueArchivist on GitHub (Oct 27, 2020). Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub. On a CD confirmed to have XCP2, BOS detects some files as Key2Audio XS, which I would consider to be very unlikely to be on the same CD. The suspected false positives are: E:\BIN\WIN32\SDKHM.DLL: Key2Audio XS E:\BIN\WIN32\SDKHM.EXE: Key2Audio XS
claunia added the question label 2026-01-29 21:04:55 +00:00
Author
Owner

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2020):

Those are actually the only files that Key2Audio XS checks for. I honestly don't know what that protection is supposed to be, given that they originated from the BurnOut original version. If you can confirm that those are not indicative of Key2Audio XS, I'd appreciate it.

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2020): Those are actually the only files that Key2Audio XS checks for. I honestly don't know what that protection is supposed to be, given that they originated from the BurnOut original version. If you can confirm that those are *not* indicative of Key2Audio XS, I'd appreciate it.
Author
Owner

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2020):

After chatting about this elsewhere, it seems like these might not be false positives after all. I will leave this open because honestly, the conclusion we came to wasn't that conclusive, but it's probably right given the evidence we have.

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2020): After chatting about this elsewhere, it seems like these might not be false positives after all. I will leave this open because honestly, the conclusion we came to wasn't that conclusive, but it's probably right given the evidence we have.
Author
Owner

@TheRogueArchivist commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2022):

Fixed by 8502924083.

@TheRogueArchivist commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2022): Fixed by 8502924083b6a5cd6e04ef8a72f83bf3a4490a13.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SabreTools/BinaryObjectScanner#13