[Request] Pull supported media speeds #238

New Issue

Closed

opened 2026-01-29 16:12:33 +00:00 by claunia · 2 comments

claunia commented 2026-01-29 16:12:33 +00:00

Owner

Copy Link

Originally created by @Madroms on GitHub (Oct 11, 2020).

Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub.

My F drive (USB) is a 4012, so max speed of 40x.
But DICUI still detects:
Supported media speeds: 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16,20,24,32,40,44,48,52,56,72

Could be a problem on my side (drive on USB with Ugreen adapter).

Not a real problem, just in case something must be checked on your side.

Originally created by @Madroms on GitHub (Oct 11, 2020). Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub. My F drive (USB) is a 4012, so max speed of 40x. But DICUI still detects: Supported media speeds: 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16,20,24,32,40,44,48,52,56,72 Could be a problem on my side (drive on USB with Ugreen adapter). Not a real problem, just in case something must be checked on your side.

claunia added the enhancementhelp wanted labels 2026-01-29 16:12:33 +00:00

claunia closed this issue 2026-01-29 16:12:35 +00:00

claunia commented 2026-01-29 16:12:37 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 12, 2020):

Yeah, unfortunately a known issue... because it doesn't actually detect speeds for a drive. It has a list of speeds internally that it pulls from for each media type. I'm going to convert this to a request, since actually pulling that data is outside of what I know how to do right now.

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 12, 2020): Yeah, unfortunately a known issue... because it doesn't *actually* detect speeds for a drive. It has a list of speeds internally that it pulls from for each media type. I'm going to convert this to a request, since *actually* pulling that data is outside of what I know how to do right now.

claunia commented 2026-01-29 16:12:38 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2023):

This is not feasible with how things are going for MPF. If this is possible in the future, then this can be reopened.

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2023): This is not feasible with how things are going for MPF. If this is possible in the future, then this can be reopened.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

master

rolling

3.6.0

3.5.0

3.4.2

3.4.1

3.4.0

3.3.3

3.3.2

3.3.1

3.3.0

3.2.4

3.2.3

3.2.2

3.2.1

3.2.0

3.1.9

3.1.8

3.1.7

3.1.6

3.1.5

3.1.4

3.1.3

3.1.2

check-rolling

ui-rolling

3.1.1

3.1.0

3.0.3

3.0.2

3.0.1

3.0.0

2.7.5

2.7.4

2.7.3

2.7.2

2.7.1

2.7.0

2.6.6

2.6.5

2.6.4

2.6.3

2.6.2

2.6.1

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.3

2.2

2.1

2.0

1.18

1.17.1

1.17

1.16.1

1.16

1.15

1.14

1.13

1.12.2

1.12.1

1.12

1.11

1.10

1.07

1.06

1.05.1

1.05

1.04b

1.04a

1.04

1.03

1.02b

1.02

1.01d

1.01c

1.01b

Labels

Clear labels

bug

duplicate

enhancement

good first issue

help wanted

invalid

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

question

regression

wontfix

No Label enhancement help wanted

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

claunia

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SabreTools/MPF#238