DVD5/9, BD25/50 combination #31

New Issue

claunia · 2026-01-29T16:08:02Z

claunia commented

2026-01-29 16:08:02 +00:00

Originally created by @mnadareski on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018).

Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub.

At some point, it may be worthwhile to figure out how to combine the single- and dual-layer entries for the disc formats that support them so there's less confusion for end users. Maybe have the output say which it ended up being.

Ideas:

Use the GetLayerbreak method to see if any layerbreak is returned. If one is returned, then it's dual layer, otherwise, single layer. This could be THE key.
Keep both internal options but only expose one of them at any given time to end users (not sure if I like this idea, but it's possible). It would also be one of those "if both exist, only show one"... which could run into potential issues

Originally created by @mnadareski on GitHub (Jun 17, 2018). Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub. At some point, it may be worthwhile to figure out how to combine the single- and dual-layer entries for the disc formats that support them so there's less confusion for end users. Maybe have the output say which it ended up being. **Ideas:** - Use the `GetLayerbreak` method to see if any layerbreak is returned. If one is returned, then it's dual layer, otherwise, single layer. This could be THE key. - Keep both internal options but only expose one of them at any given time to end users (not sure if I like this idea, but it's possible). It would also be one of those "if both exist, only show one"... which could run into potential issues

claunia added the enhancement help wanted good first issue labels 2026-01-29 16:08:02 +00:00

claunia closed this issue

2026-01-29 16:08:03 +00:00

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 16:24:14 +00:00

[PR #31] [MERGED] Add verification for overwrite #910

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SabreTools/MPF#31