[Request] Can MPF Generate Software/Hardware descriptions for what is used to dump, in the submission file? #340

New Issue

Closed

opened 2026-01-29 16:14:37 +00:00 by claunia · 1 comment

claunia commented 2026-01-29 16:14:37 +00:00

Owner

Copy Link

Originally created by @sadikyo on GitHub (Oct 8, 2021).

Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not really a 'problem' - just that it might be nice to see this info consolidated.

Describe the solution you'd like
I think it'd be helpful, if MPF could extract the MPF version, DIC version, and Hardware used for dumping a particular dump, and put that in the submission file. This way, mods and users could easily see exactly what was used for that particular dump, which is sometimes helpful with troubleshooting / reviewing issues / etc.

Describe alternatives you've considered
The info is in the various log files, so we can dig around and find it if we need to.

Additional context
If this is difficult or "not worth it" ok, that's fine - we can at least get the info somehow.

Originally created by @sadikyo on GitHub (Oct 8, 2021). Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub. **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Not really a 'problem' - just that it might be nice to see this info consolidated. **Describe the solution you'd like** I think it'd be helpful, if MPF could extract the MPF version, DIC version, and Hardware used for dumping a particular dump, and put that in the submission file. This way, mods and users could easily see exactly what was used for that particular dump, which is sometimes helpful with troubleshooting / reviewing issues / etc. **Describe alternatives you've considered** The info is in the various log files, so we can dig around and find it if we need to. **Additional context** If this is difficult or "not worth it" ok, that's fine - we can at least get the info somehow.

claunia added the enhancement label 2026-01-29 16:14:37 +00:00

claunia closed this issue 2026-01-29 16:14:38 +00:00

claunia commented 2026-01-29 16:14:38 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 17, 2022):

Software addressed as of 1dd5c0d6d0
Hardware addressed as of e7c36c104a

@mnadareski commented on GitHub (Oct 17, 2022): Software addressed as of https://github.com/SabreTools/MPF/commit/1dd5c0d6d0b07526a3851d03da2ef73338f17311 Hardware addressed as of https://github.com/SabreTools/MPF/commit/e7c36c104a2813a6b129bbd0b8c6917c63b272c6

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

master

rolling

3.6.0

3.5.0

3.4.2

3.4.1

3.4.0

3.3.3

3.3.2

3.3.1

3.3.0

3.2.4

3.2.3

3.2.2

3.2.1

3.2.0

3.1.9

3.1.8

3.1.7

3.1.6

3.1.5

3.1.4

3.1.3

3.1.2

check-rolling

ui-rolling

3.1.1

3.1.0

3.0.3

3.0.2

3.0.1

3.0.0

2.7.5

2.7.4

2.7.3

2.7.2

2.7.1

2.7.0

2.6.6

2.6.5

2.6.4

2.6.3

2.6.2

2.6.1

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.3

2.2

2.1

2.0

1.18

1.17.1

1.17

1.16.1

1.16

1.15

1.14

1.13

1.12.2

1.12.1

1.12

1.11

1.10

1.07

1.06

1.05.1

1.05

1.04b

1.04a

1.04

1.03

1.02b

1.02

1.01d

1.01c

1.01b

Labels

Clear labels

bug

duplicate

enhancement

good first issue

help wanted

invalid

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

question

regression

wontfix

No Label enhancement

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

claunia

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SabreTools/MPF#340