[Request] New "image cleanup" feature deletes DIC CCD image variants without asking. #415

New Issue

Closed

opened 2026-01-29 16:16:05 +00:00 by claunia · 1 comment

claunia commented 2026-01-29 16:16:05 +00:00

Owner

Copy Link

Originally created by @bleggett on GitHub (Mar 26, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Previous behavior would keep all the image format types DIC creates (BIN/CUE/CCD/etc). This was handy - as some software and some ODEs (specifically a few for the Saturn) only work with CCD format images.

Now that MPF deletes those images on completion, I either have to use DIC by itself, or take the extra step with other software to convert the bin/cue to CCD, which is an annoying and occasionally error-prone process that does not always leave me with a 1:1 clone.

Describe the solution you'd like
A checkbox named "Delete alternate image formats on completion" or something similar, so I can choose if I want MPF to go behind DIC and do this or not, rather than MPF assuming I always want to do this.

Originally created by @bleggett on GitHub (Mar 26, 2022). Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub. **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Previous behavior would keep all the image format types DIC creates (BIN/CUE/CCD/etc). This was handy - as some software and some ODEs (specifically a few for the Saturn) only work with CCD format images. Now that MPF deletes those images on completion, I either have to use DIC by itself, or take the extra step with other software to convert the bin/cue to CCD, which is an annoying and occasionally error-prone process that does not always leave me with a 1:1 clone. **Describe the solution you'd like** A checkbox named "Delete alternate image formats on completion" or something similar, so I can choose if I _want_ MPF to go behind DIC and do this or not, rather than MPF assuming I always want to do this.

claunia added the enhancement label 2026-01-29 16:16:05 +00:00

claunia closed this issue 2026-01-29 16:16:05 +00:00

claunia commented 2026-01-29 16:16:06 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@bleggett commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2022):

Okay scratch that, realized that MPF now zips the .ccd and .sub files in with the logs, so they're still there.

Nevermind!

@bleggett commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2022): Okay scratch that, realized that MPF now zips the `.ccd` and `.sub` files in with the logs, so they're still there. Nevermind!

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

master

rolling

3.6.0

3.5.0

3.4.2

3.4.1

3.4.0

3.3.3

3.3.2

3.3.1

3.3.0

3.2.4

3.2.3

3.2.2

3.2.1

3.2.0

3.1.9

3.1.8

3.1.7

3.1.6

3.1.5

3.1.4

3.1.3

3.1.2

check-rolling

ui-rolling

3.1.1

3.1.0

3.0.3

3.0.2

3.0.1

3.0.0

2.7.5

2.7.4

2.7.3

2.7.2

2.7.1

2.7.0

2.6.6

2.6.5

2.6.4

2.6.3

2.6.2

2.6.1

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.3

2.2

2.1

2.0

1.18

1.17.1

1.17

1.16.1

1.16

1.15

1.14

1.13

1.12.2

1.12.1

1.12

1.11

1.10

1.07

1.06

1.05.1

1.05

1.04b

1.04a

1.04

1.03

1.02b

1.02

1.01d

1.01c

1.01b

Labels

Clear labels

bug

duplicate

enhancement

good first issue

help wanted

invalid

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

question

regression

wontfix

No Label enhancement

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

claunia

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SabreTools/MPF#415