[Problem] [Xbox 360] duplication of XeMID, DMI, etc. when verifying a disc #560

Closed
opened 2026-01-29 16:18:31 +00:00 by claunia · 0 comments
Owner

Originally created by @mictlantecuhtle on GitHub (Jul 10, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub.

Version

  • WIP release (v2.5-12fd55e7)

Build

  • .NET Framework 4.8 running on (Operating System)

Describe the issue
When verifying an Xbox 360 disc, MPF both pulls the existing information for XeMID, DMI, PFI etc. from the comments and adds new information to those same fields. This can result in duplication as follows (for http://redump.org/disc/37091/):

<b>XeMID</b>: BS202201L02F11, BS202201L02F11
<b>DMI</b>: 8C70E948, D82C1B4D, BA9E12CE, 8C70E948
<b>PFI</b>: 26AF4C58, 26AF4C58
<b>SS</b>: 608E1DE8
<b>SS version</b>: 02
<b>SSv2</b>: 95E33438, 1DA16F23, BCA13B5C

To Reproduce
Dump an Xbox 360 disc which is known to verify an existing entry using MPF and DiscImageCreator

Expected behavior
It would be preferable for these cases if MPF did not pull existing information from the comments but rather only added information available from the dump logs themselves. As dumpers have to post verifications to the forum anyway, moderators can easily check and add new information to the existing entry

Originally created by @mictlantecuhtle on GitHub (Jul 10, 2023). Originally assigned to: @mnadareski on GitHub. **Version** - [X] WIP release (v2.5-12fd55e7) **Build** - [X] .NET Framework 4.8 running on (Operating System) **Describe the issue** When verifying an Xbox 360 disc, MPF both pulls the existing information for XeMID, DMI, PFI etc. from the comments _and_ adds new information to those same fields. This can result in duplication as follows (for http://redump.org/disc/37091/): ~~~ <b>XeMID</b>: BS202201L02F11, BS202201L02F11 <b>DMI</b>: 8C70E948, D82C1B4D, BA9E12CE, 8C70E948 <b>PFI</b>: 26AF4C58, 26AF4C58 <b>SS</b>: 608E1DE8 <b>SS version</b>: 02 <b>SSv2</b>: 95E33438, 1DA16F23, BCA13B5C ~~~ **To Reproduce** Dump an Xbox 360 disc which is known to verify an existing entry using MPF and DiscImageCreator **Expected behavior** It would be preferable for these cases if MPF did not pull existing information from the comments but rather only added information available from the dump logs themselves. As dumpers have to post verifications to the forum anyway, moderators can easily check and add new information to the existing entry
claunia added the bug label 2026-01-29 16:18:31 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SabreTools/MPF#560