mirror of
https://github.com/google/brotli.git
synced 2026-07-08 17:56:58 +00:00
Dated README links #545
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @GinnyGlider on GitHub (Aug 1, 2025).
Seven of the README links have become dated,
yet they still function due to redirects.
Two of the links are HTTP.
And One being a 404.
—
Here are the following lines of the dated links and their
new replacements (Based on the link's redirect destination) :
[Note: Due to GitHub's formatting, the order is new vs old links]
—
Redirects to:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7932a47d747506/README.md (L15)Redirects to:
https://bazel.build/(With HTTPS)a47d747506/README.md (L40)Redirects to:
https://groups.google.com/g/brotlia47d747506/README.md (L68)Redirects to:
HTTPSa47d747506/README.md (L79)Redirects to:
https://github.com/foliojs/brotli.js(Legal advice may be needed)a47d747506/README.md (L87)Redirects to:
404(Legal advice may be needed)a47d747506/README.md (L93)Redirects to:
https://pub.dev/documentation/es_compression/latest/brotli/a47d747506/README.md (L95)—
Reasoning behind this issue:
I have come over from nixpkgs repository after a pull-request concerning
an outdated Internet-Draft link which lead to a 404. In order to update it
I had to find an official source, which was the Brotli repository itself.
—
The new link source I choose here was
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7932However, despite being official it leads as a redirect, so I opted to instead
update it with the redirect destination, which (at the time of writing) is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7932—
I needed the nix Brotli package but the description and the dated
Internet-Draft link ignored me enough to create a PR there and
an issue here. I decided to briefly examine the README page
for dated links, and here I am with this issue. I'm sure there
are others here too, but that's what I have the time for.
—
It's a minor issue, I know I could've done a PR, however the
requirement for sighing a CLA is about as far as I can pursue
for a simple change.
@eustas commented on GitHub (Sep 30, 2025):
Thanks for reporting and thorough checks. Will be fixed soon.
@eustas commented on GitHub (Oct 1, 2025):
Fixed.