[PR #716] [IMPROVEMENT]GSoC qualification: Make CCExtractor more linux standard compliant #678 #1549

New Issue

claunia · 2026-01-29T17:17:07Z

claunia commented

2026-01-29 17:17:07 +00:00

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/pull/716

State: closed
Merged: No

Please prefix your pull request with one of the following: [FEATURE] [FIX] [IMPROVEMENT].

In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):

I have read and understood the contributors guide.
I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):

I have never used CCExtractor.
I have used CCExtractor just a couple of times.
I absolutely love CCExtractor, but have not contributed previously.
I am an active contributor to CCExtractor.

Successfully wrote Autoconf scripts without changing any other file or script. Prior build mechanisms still work and README.md is updated accordingly.

(I admit pull request exists but pre-existing files were modified in that patch and this one doesn't.)
Autoconf tools are required for this because if scripts are to be modified they need to have Autoconf tools installed.

**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/pull/716 **State:** closed **Merged:** No --- Please prefix your pull request with one of the following: **[FEATURE]** **[FIX]** **[IMPROVEMENT]**. **In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):** - [x] I have read and understood the [contributors guide](https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md). - [x] I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist. - [x] I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others. - [x] I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer. - [x] I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content. **My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):** - [ ] I have never used CCExtractor. - [x] I have used CCExtractor just a couple of times. - [ ] I absolutely love CCExtractor, but have not contributed previously. - [ ] I am an active contributor to CCExtractor. --- Successfully wrote Autoconf scripts without changing any other file or script. Prior build mechanisms still work and README.md is updated accordingly. (I admit pull request exists but pre-existing files were modified in that patch and this one doesn't.) Autoconf tools are required for this because if scripts are to be modified they need to have Autoconf tools installed.

claunia added the pull-request label 2026-01-29 17:17:07 +00:00

claunia closed this issue

2026-01-29 17:17:08 +00:00

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 17:21:21 +00:00

[PR #1572] [FIX] #1549 Configure Script #2290

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 17:21:21 +00:00

[PR #1574] [MERGED] [FIX] #1549 Configure Script #2291

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 17:21:21 +00:00

[PR #1574] [FIX] #1549 Configure Script #2294