[PR #1149] [IMPROVEMENT] Minor styling improvement. #1932

New Issue

claunia · 2026-01-29T17:19:19Z

claunia commented

2026-01-29 17:19:19 +00:00

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/pull/1149

State: closed
Merged: Yes

Please prefix your pull request with one of the following: [FEATURE] [FIX] [IMPROVEMENT].

In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):

I have read and understood the contributors guide.
I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.
[] I have mentioned this change in the changelog.

My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):

I have never used CCExtractor.
I have used CCExtractor just a couple of times.
I absolutely love CCExtractor, but have not contributed previously.
I am an active contributor to CCExtractor.

Motivation:
I was considering to do *scc, *ccd adding task, hence looked deeper in the code connected with it.
And I saw a lot of different styles, some minor errors, not well optimized if clauses, forgotten fatal-warnings, not updated cnf.sample file and so on.
To put all these corrections in *scc, *cdd pull request would not be a good idea, so here I am with that brand new pull request.

**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/pull/1149 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- Please prefix your pull request with one of the following: **[FEATURE]** **[FIX]** **[IMPROVEMENT]**. **In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):** - [x] I have read and understood the [contributors guide](https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md). - [x] I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist. - [x] I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others. - [x] I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer. - [x] I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content. - [] **I have mentioned this change in the [changelog](https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/blob/master/docs/CHANGES.TXT).** **My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):** - [ ] I have never used CCExtractor. - [x] I have used CCExtractor just a couple of times. - [ ] I absolutely love CCExtractor, but have not contributed previously. - [ ] I am an active contributor to CCExtractor. --- Motivation: I was considering to do *scc, *ccd adding task, hence looked deeper in the code connected with it. And I saw a lot of different styles, some minor errors, not well optimized if clauses, forgotten fatal-warnings, not updated cnf.sample file and so on. To put all these corrections in *scc, *cdd pull request would not be a good idea, so here I am with that brand new pull request.

claunia added the pull-request label 2026-01-29 17:19:19 +00:00

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 17:23:38 +00:00

[PR #1932] [MERGED] docs: Add Windows package manager installation instructions #2731

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 17:23:39 +00:00

[PR #1932] docs: Add Windows package manager installation instructions #2733

Sign in to join this conversation.