[PROPOSAL] Chocolatey package? #619

New Issue

claunia · 2026-01-29T16:49:14Z

claunia commented

2026-01-29 16:49:14 +00:00

Originally created by @rlaphoenix on GitHub (Mar 27, 2021).

In raising this issue, I confirm the following:

I have read and understood the contributors guide.
I have checked that the bug-fix I am reporting can be replicated, or that the feature I am suggesting isn't already present.
I have checked that the issue I'm posting isn't already reported.
I have checked that the issue I'm porting isn't already solved and no duplicates exist in closed issues and in opened issues
I have checked the pull requests tab for existing solutions/implementations to my issue/suggestion.
I have used the latest available version of CCExtractor to verify this issue exists.
I have ticked all the boxes in this section and to prove it I'm deleting the section completely to remove boilerplate text.

Necessary information

Is this a regression (i.e. did it work before)? No
What platform did you use? Windows
What were the used arguments? N/A

Additional information

It would be amazing to get this package on Chocolatey. I see you recently tried an InstallShield approach which seemingly got canned. So it's a perfect time to try out Chocolatey since it has the potential for the InstallShield's purpose, but without the hassle.

Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org
Creating Packages Docs: https://docs.chocolatey.org/en-us/create/

Originally created by @rlaphoenix on GitHub (Mar 27, 2021). # In raising this issue, I confirm the following: - [x] I have read and understood the [contributors guide](https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md). - [x] I have checked that the bug-fix I am reporting can be replicated, or that the feature I am suggesting isn't already present. - [x] I have checked that the issue I'm posting isn't already reported. - [x] I have checked that the issue I'm porting isn't already solved and no duplicates exist in [closed issues](https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed) and in [opened issues](https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/issues) - [x] I have checked the pull requests tab for existing solutions/implementations to my issue/suggestion. - [x] I have used the latest available version of CCExtractor to verify this issue exists. - [x] I have ticked all the boxes in this section and to prove it I'm deleting the section completely to remove boilerplate text. # Necessary information - Is this a regression (i.e. did it work before)? No - What platform did you use? Windows - What were the used arguments? N/A # Additional information It would be amazing to get this package on Chocolatey. I see you recently tried an InstallShield approach which seemingly got canned. So it's a perfect time to try out Chocolatey since it has the potential for the InstallShield's purpose, but without the hassle. Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org Creating Packages Docs: https://docs.chocolatey.org/en-us/create/

claunia closed this issue

2026-01-29 16:49:14 +00:00

claunia commented

2026-01-29 16:49:15 +00:00

@cfsmp3 commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2021):

A problem is that it doesn't support Windows XP. Which might seem not important in 2021, but it is: XP is the last DRM free Windows version, so some power users are sticking to it.

@cfsmp3 commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2021): A problem is that it doesn't support Windows XP. Which might seem not important in 2021, but it is: XP is the last DRM free Windows version, so some power users are sticking to it.

claunia commented

2026-01-29 16:49:15 +00:00

@rlaphoenix commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2021):

And why would that prevent ccextractor from releasing on chocolatey?
Chocolatey can be automated based on how the packages are currently being released. So if the packagers release as they are now (including XP support) and chocolatey auto-updates on the repo, then all that's gained is easier installation and updating for Windows 7+.

@rlaphoenix commented on GitHub (Mar 29, 2021): And why would that prevent ccextractor from releasing on chocolatey? Chocolatey can be automated based on how the packages are currently being released. So if the packagers release as they are now (including XP support) and chocolatey auto-updates on the repo, then all that's gained is easier installation and updating for Windows 7+.

claunia commented

2026-01-29 16:49:16 +00:00

@canihavesomecoffee commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021):

@rlaphoenix Is right, there's no reason why we couldn't also publish to Chocolatey. We just need someone to update the GH Actions workflows to do this in an automated way for us.

Relevant lecture: https://www.dolthub.com/blog/2021-10-13-how-to-publish-winget-chocolatey-packages-with-github-actions/

@canihavesomecoffee commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2021): @rlaphoenix Is right, there's no reason why we couldn't also publish to Chocolatey. We just need someone to update the GH Actions workflows to do this in an automated way for us. Relevant lecture: https://www.dolthub.com/blog/2021-10-13-how-to-publish-winget-chocolatey-packages-with-github-actions/

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 17:16:33 +00:00

[PR #619] [MERGED] Fixes #618 #1455

claunia referenced this issue

2026-01-29 17:16:34 +00:00

[PR #619] Fixes #618 #1458

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/ccextractor#619