mirror of
https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor.git
synced 2026-02-04 05:44:53 +00:00
[PROPOSAL]: Snap package for ccextractor
#790
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @soumyaDghosh on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023).
I have created a snap package for the
ccextractor. The main enhancement by this, is the fact that it can be used in any distro now, even if it's a non-LTS Ubuntu release, or an Arch based distro or anything else.Also, if I can get some help in testing the package, that'd also be helpful.
@SparklinStar commented on GitHub (Jan 24, 2024):
I can help you with testing the package in Fedora 39.
@SP-XD commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2024):
Create a appImage its better than a snap package
@cfsmp3 commented on GitHub (Dec 28, 2025):
@soumyaDghosh Did you send a PR? What do you need from us?
In any case this should be, I suppose, a GitHub workflow that creates the snap package automatically as needed.
@Akki2005 commented on GitHub (Jan 6, 2026):
Hi, I’m interested in helping with this.
From the discussion, it sounds like the preferred direction would be:
Before proceeding, I wanted to confirm:
Happy to draft a proposal once direction is confirmed.
@x15sr71 commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026):
Hi all, just a quick follow-up on this proposal.
I’ve opened PR #1998, which implements Snap packaging for CCExtractor based on this discussion.
As suggested here, it’s done via a GitHub Actions workflow that builds the Snap automatically.
Thanks to @soumyaDghosh for the original proposal and to everyone who weighed in here.
If you have any thoughts or spot something worth adjusting, feel free to share, happy to iterate.
@soumyaDghosh commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026):
@x15sr71 Please refrain from submitting low-quality, LLM generated contributions that waste everyone's time.
@x15sr71 commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026):
@soumyaDghosh Thanks for the feedback.
I’m happy to address any specific technical concerns with the implementation, please feel free to point them out directly in the PR so they can be reviewed and improved if needed.
The goal here is to move the Snap proposal forward in line with maintainer guidance.