[PR #64] [WIP] RPM packaging doesn't flag .NET Core DLLs as executables #209

Open
opened 2026-01-29 16:31:15 +00:00 by claunia · 0 comments
Owner

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/quamotion/dotnet-packaging/pull/64

State: open
Merged: No


[Discussion item. Not yet ready to merge]

PR to resolve issue #61 - proposes a range of changes to improve the accuracy of the test scenarios that read back existing RPM package by taking their metadata into account, introduces explicit archive file types for .NET assemblies and documentation files, adds detection for .NET assemblies, and adds a metadata extension to explicitly flag documentation files.

**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/quamotion/dotnet-packaging/pull/64 **State:** open **Merged:** No --- [Discussion item. Not yet ready to merge] PR to resolve issue #61 - proposes a range of changes to improve the accuracy of the test scenarios that read back existing RPM package by taking their metadata into account, introduces explicit archive file types for .NET assemblies and documentation files, adds detection for .NET assemblies, and adds a metadata extension to explicitly flag documentation files.
claunia added the pull-request label 2026-01-29 16:31:15 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/dotnet-packaging#209