[PR #132] Support implicit .NET dependencies for RPM packages, too #253

New Issue

claunia · 2026-01-29T16:31:37Z

claunia commented

2026-01-29 16:31:37 +00:00

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/quamotion/dotnet-packaging/pull/132

State: closed
Merged: Yes

For Debian packages, we split the list of package-specific dependencies and .NET Core dependencies (either the framework itself or the dependencies of the framework) in two different variables.

Do the same for RPM packages.

This allows you to specify your package-specific dependencies, without having to worry too much about the .NET Core dependencies, getting us one step closer to "it just works"

**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/quamotion/dotnet-packaging/pull/132 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- For Debian packages, we split the list of package-specific dependencies and .NET Core dependencies (either the framework itself or the dependencies of the framework) in two different variables. Do the same for RPM packages. This allows you to specify your package-specific dependencies, without having to worry too much about the .NET Core dependencies, getting us one step closer to "it just works"

claunia added the pull-request label 2026-01-29 16:31:37 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/dotnet-packaging#253