starred/markdig
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/xoofx/markdig.git synced 2026-02-12 13:54:45 +00:00
Code Issues 690 Packages Projects Releases 21 Wiki Activity

Investigate how to test netstandard2.0+ #763

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-01-29 14:44:58 +00:00 by claunia · 2 comments
claunia commented 2026-01-29 14:44:58 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @xoofx on GitHub (Nov 17, 2025).

After commit fb69859, because I wanted to bump Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, it is no longer possible to use net6.0 in the tests, which means that we are no longer exercising netstandard2.0+ Markdig code.

Not sure what to do with this, if there is a solution that is not too complicated, or we have to live with this.

cc: @MihaZupan

Originally created by @xoofx on GitHub (Nov 17, 2025). After commit fb69859, because I wanted to bump `Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk`, it is no longer possible to use `net6.0` in the tests, which means that we are no longer exercising `netstandard2.0+` Markdig code. Not sure what to do with this, if there is a solution that is not too complicated, or we have to live with this. cc: @MihaZupan
claunia added the enhancement label 2026-01-29 14:44:58 +00:00
claunia commented 2026-01-29 14:44:59 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MihaZupan commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2025):

Put up a PR that tests it only in CI by patching the library to only build 1 TFM, then running .NET 8/9 tests against it.

We're also missing .NET Framework coverage since 40781737c3, I might have to look at fixing that at some point

@MihaZupan commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2025): Put up a PR that tests it only in CI by patching the library to only build 1 TFM, then running .NET 8/9 tests against it. We're also missing .NET Framework coverage since 40781737c35c6c12c02969a4771376ce334c4691, I might have to look at fixing that at some point
claunia commented 2026-01-29 14:45:02 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@xoofx commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2025):

Put up a PR that tests it only in CI by patching the library to only build 1 TFM, then running .NET 8/9 tests against it.

Hacky solution, but okish 😀

@xoofx commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2025): > Put up a PR that tests it only in CI by patching the library to only build 1 TFM, then running .NET 8/9 tests against it. Hacky solution, but okish 😀
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
documentation
enhancement
extension
Hacktoberfest
invalid
PR Welcome!
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No Label enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
claunia
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/markdig#763
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?