starred/radzen-blazor
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/radzenhq/radzen-blazor.git synced 2026-02-04 05:35:44 +00:00
Code Issues 1.3k Packages Projects Releases 22 Wiki Activity

Scheduler Day/Week Appointments Viewed as Overlapping when Not #454

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-01-29 17:37:36 +00:00 by claunia · 2 comments
claunia commented 2026-01-29 17:37:36 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @maarkkushere on GitHub (Jul 1, 2022).

When one appointment starts at the same time another ends, they act as if they are overlapping if the time is not a slot boundary. If it is a slot boundary, everything works fine.
Capture

As you can see, with "Skype call" ending at 1pm and "Dentist appointment" starting at 1pm, there is no issue. With "Test overlap 1" ending at 3:15 and "Test overlap 2" starting at 3:15, they display differently like when an overlap happens. This happens with the default slot minutes of 30. If I change the slot minutes to 15, then this example works also (although there are other issues as noted in other posts that you are working on with changing slot minutes). Seems to happen when the appointments touch at non-slot boundaries if that makes sense.

Originally created by @maarkkushere on GitHub (Jul 1, 2022). When one appointment starts at the same time another ends, they act as if they are overlapping if the time is not a slot boundary. If it is a slot boundary, everything works fine. ![Capture](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/98479389/176923391-38eb635d-0106-4123-93f7-2b3337a7820d.PNG) As you can see, with "Skype call" ending at 1pm and "Dentist appointment" starting at 1pm, there is no issue. With "Test overlap 1" ending at 3:15 and "Test overlap 2" starting at 3:15, they display differently like when an overlap happens. This happens with the default slot minutes of 30. If I change the slot minutes to 15, then this example works also (although there are other issues as noted in other posts that you are working on with changing slot minutes). Seems to happen when the appointments touch at non-slot boundaries if that makes sense.
claunia added the enhancement label 2026-01-29 17:37:36 +00:00
claunia commented 2026-01-29 17:37:36 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@akorchev commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2024):

Should work now.

@akorchev commented on GitHub (Dec 4, 2024): Should work now.
claunia commented 2026-01-29 17:37:36 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@maarkkushere commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2024):

Awesome! Thank you!

@maarkkushere commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2024): Awesome! Thank you!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
enhancement
good first issue
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
claunia
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/radzen-blazor#454
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?