Background image scale mode #10122

Closed
opened 2026-01-31 02:13:04 +00:00 by claunia · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @ZeroCoolGOS on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020).

Description of the new feature/enhancement

Within the settings file we have the option to set the background image stretch mode. What would also be nice is if we can scale the image as well. Could be done via pixels, or percentage based.

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

"backgroundImageScaleXY": (640,480)
or
"backgroundImageScaleX": 640
"backgroundImageScaleY": 480
or
"backgroundImageScale": 100%

Originally created by @ZeroCoolGOS on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020). <!-- 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING BEFORE PROCEEDING: 1. If I delete this entire template and go my own path, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 2. If I list multiple bugs/concerns in this one issue, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 3. If I write an issue that has many duplicates, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement (and without necessarily spending time to find the exact duplicate ID number). 4. If I leave the title incomplete when filing the issue, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 5. If I file something completely blank in the body, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. All good? Then proceed! --> # Description of the new feature/enhancement Within the settings file we have the option to set the background image stretch mode. What would also be nice is if we can scale the image as well. Could be done via pixels, or percentage based. # Proposed technical implementation details (optional) "backgroundImageScaleXY": (640,480) or "backgroundImageScaleX": 640 "backgroundImageScaleY": 480 or "backgroundImageScale": 100%
claunia added the Issue-FeatureResolution-Duplicate labels 2026-01-31 02:13:04 +00:00
Author
Owner

@skyline75489 commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020):

I think this is another form of #2370 .

@skyline75489 commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020): I think this is another form of #2370 .
Author
Owner

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020):

Thanks for the suggestion! This is actually already being tracked by another issue on our repo - please refer to #2370 for more discussion.

/dup #2370

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020): Thanks for the suggestion! This is actually already being tracked by another issue on our repo - please refer to #2370 for more discussion. /dup #2370
Author
Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020):

Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report!

@ghost commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2020): Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report!
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/terminal#10122