add config except list to those exe that should not using WT #22100

Closed
opened 2026-01-31 08:03:28 +00:00 by claunia · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @heartacker on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024).

Description of the new feature/enhancement

after using WT, all things are open int WT
PLEASE add a config list so that users can make some except exe。PLEASE

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

add setting to except some application

Originally created by @heartacker on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024). <!-- 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING BEFORE PROCEEDING: 1. If I delete this entire template and go my own path, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 2. If I list multiple bugs/concerns in this one issue, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 3. If I write an issue that has many duplicates, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement (and without necessarily spending time to find the exact duplicate ID number). 4. If I leave the title incomplete when filing the issue, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 5. If I file something completely blank in the body, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. All good? Then proceed! --> # Description of the new feature/enhancement after using WT, all things are open int WT PLEASE add a config list so that users can make some except exe。PLEASE <!-- A clear and concise description of what the problem is that the new feature would solve. Describe why and how a user would use this new functionality (if applicable). --> # Proposed technical implementation details (optional) add setting to except some application <!-- A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. -->
claunia added the Resolution-ExternalResolution-Duplicate labels 2026-01-31 08:03:28 +00:00
Author
Owner

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024):

Can I ask first what scenario isn't working for that app, such that you'd want it to not open in Terminal/? I'd rather fix that scenario, than offer an opt-out 😉

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024): Can I ask first what scenario isn't working for that app, such that you'd want it to not open in Terminal/? I'd rather fix that scenario, than offer an opt-out 😉
Author
Owner

@heartacker commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

@zadjii-msft FYI
image

@heartacker commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): @zadjii-msft FYI ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3f25b61e-c36f-4ddc-adeb-c72937a47efa)
Author
Owner

@heartacker commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

it had to open a terminal while I am using the octave GUI

image

@heartacker commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): it had to open a terminal while I am using the octave GUI ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c5239f4-0e8d-4288-8b80-4d3b9c4c3c82)
Author
Owner

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

Yea... that thread doesn't really have anything valuable in it. https://octave.discourse.group/t/cli-is-open-together-with-gui-in-octave-7-1-on-windows-11/2753/14 has some additional info, but it sounds kinda like they just don't have the support to deal with this case.

Reading between the lines, I'm guessing they were using ShowWindow(GetConsoleWindow(), SW_HIDE) to hide a console they were spawning, instead of just requesting a hidden one to begin with.

I'd much rather help them sort that out on their side, than offer a bodgy opt-out on our side ☺️

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): Yea... that thread doesn't really have anything valuable in it. https://octave.discourse.group/t/cli-is-open-together-with-gui-in-octave-7-1-on-windows-11/2753/14 has _some_ additional info, but it sounds kinda like they just don't have the support to deal with this case. Reading between the lines, I'm guessing they were using `ShowWindow(GetConsoleWindow(), SW_HIDE)` to hide a console they were spawning, instead of just _requesting a hidden one to begin with_. I'd much rather help them sort that out on their side, than offer a bodgy opt-out on our side ☺️
Author
Owner

@carlos-zamora commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

Thanks for filing! Due to the earlier discussion, we're going to mark this as a /dup of #17054.

@carlos-zamora commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): Thanks for filing! Due to the earlier discussion, we're going to mark this as a /dup of #17054.
Author
Owner

@microsoft-github-policy-service[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report!

@microsoft-github-policy-service[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report! <!-- Policy app identification https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=PullRequestIssueManagement. -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/terminal#22100