[PR #4595] Chain assigning origin members to 0 to make the code more readable and make its context clearer. #25858

Open
opened 2026-01-31 09:12:16 +00:00 by claunia · 0 comments
Owner

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/4595

State: closed
Merged: No


Summary of the Pull Request

The origin is 0, 0. The X and Y, by definition, must be set to 0, which is the same in both .X and .Y members. Because of this, it makes more sense to chain assign them to 0.

Changes were tested manually and automatically.

References

PR Checklist

  • Closes #xxx
  • CLA signed. If not, go over here and sign the CLA
  • Tests added/passed
  • Requires documentation to be updated
  • I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx

Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments

Validation Steps Performed

Manual Testing
Automated Testing

**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/4595 **State:** closed **Merged:** No --- <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The origin is 0, 0. The X and Y, by definition, must be set to 0, which is the same in both .X and .Y members. Because of this, it makes more sense to chain assign them to 0. Changes were tested manually and automatically. <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [ ] Closes #xxx * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated * [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed Manual Testing Automated Testing
claunia added the pull-request label 2026-01-31 09:12:16 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label pull-request
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/terminal#25858