Feature Request : Make BackgroundImage avaliable for websites #2722

Closed
opened 2026-01-30 23:03:15 +00:00 by claunia · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @SJang1 on GitHub (Jul 12, 2019).

Summary of the new feature/enhancement

Make BackgroundImage avaliable(load) not for only image, also can load websites or html file but just like a image. (Not avaliable to click or type in. It is terminal, not web browser)
( ~~ So I can load like clock website to see the time in the terminal ~~ )

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

BackgroundImage also loads website, local html file, etc.. whatever it could be loaded.

Originally created by @SJang1 on GitHub (Jul 12, 2019). # Summary of the new feature/enhancement Make BackgroundImage avaliable(load) not for only image, also can load websites or html file but just like a image. (Not avaliable to click or type in. It is terminal, not web browser) ( ~~ So I can load like clock website to see the time in the terminal ~~ ) # Proposed technical implementation details (optional) BackgroundImage also loads website, local html file, etc.. whatever it could be loaded.
Author
Owner

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2019):

I don't think this is a terrible idea. It kinda plays into the idea we were discussing in another thread about having a "stack" of backgrounds.

Might make more sense as an extension, though I guess that's something to work out when we're designing that.

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2019): I don't think this is a _terrible_ idea. It kinda plays into the idea we were discussing in another thread about having a "stack" of backgrounds. Might make more sense as an extension, though I guess that's something to work out when we're designing that.
Author
Owner

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2019):

Hey, thanks for the suggestion. This isn't something we're going to be pursuing for a while, and it looks like it might not be possible with our architecture today.
I'm going to close this out. Sorry!

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2019): Hey, thanks for the suggestion. This isn't something we're going to be pursuing for a while, and it looks like it might not be possible with our architecture today. I'm going to close this out. Sorry!
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/terminal#2722