starred/terminal
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/terminal.git synced 2026-02-04 05:35:20 +00:00
Code Issues 19.0k Packages Projects Releases 20 Wiki Activity

[PR #10806] [MERGED] Passing through moveFocus keys when moving to another pane failed #28238

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-01-31 09:27:13 +00:00 by claunia · 0 comments
claunia commented 2026-01-31 09:27:13 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/10806
Author: @FWest98
Created: 7/27/2021
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 7/28/2021
Merged by: @undefined

Base: main ← Head: fix/6219

📝 Commits (4)

  • 503ebb3 Passing through moveFocus keys when moving to another pane failed
  • 517f326 Fix spelling
  • 91ee903 Fix spelling
  • 197973c Incorporate feedback

📊 Changes

5 files changed (+18 additions, -12 deletions)

View changed files

📝 src/cascadia/TerminalApp/AppActionHandlers.cpp (+5 -2)
📝 src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalPage.cpp (+5 -3)
📝 src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalPage.h (+1 -1)
📝 src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalTab.cpp (+6 -5)
📝 src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalTab.h (+1 -1)

📄 Description

Summary of the Pull Request

Implementation of #6219 with a small tweak, not just passing the keys when no panes are present, but passing on the keys when there is no other pane to move to. This enables another usecase: 2 panes in terminal split vertically; in one of these panes running tmux with two panes that are split horizontally. This allows the user to still navigate between tmux panes even though they have terminal panes open.

References

Not that I know of

PR Checklist

  • Closes Tmux doesn't refresh properly (#6219)
  • CLA signed.
  • Tests added/passed
  • Documentation updated. I don't think that's necessary
  • Schema updated. N/A
  • I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan.

Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments

Implementation by propagating the boolean indicating success of moving focus all the way to the action handler, where this result will determine whether the action will be considered handled or not. When the action is not handled, the keychord will be propagated to the terminal.

Validation Steps Performed

Manual testing; all relevant unit tests still work

🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/10806 **Author:** [@FWest98](https://github.com/FWest98) **Created:** 7/27/2021 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 7/28/2021 **Merged by:** [@undefined](undefined) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `fix/6219` --- ### 📝 Commits (4) - [`503ebb3`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/commit/503ebb34a627fe9c9a5d0f9bc77b5ec131691ab9) Passing through moveFocus keys when moving to another pane failed - [`517f326`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/commit/517f3260ac819efd800669742f50a7db65627e71) Fix spelling - [`91ee903`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/commit/91ee903a102c1f7f3beefd0a2cc2fc48e52cf20f) Fix spelling - [`197973c`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/commit/197973caff0b20f7d89cb75583cb41118c119724) Incorporate feedback ### 📊 Changes **5 files changed** (+18 additions, -12 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `src/cascadia/TerminalApp/AppActionHandlers.cpp` (+5 -2) 📝 `src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalPage.cpp` (+5 -3) 📝 `src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalPage.h` (+1 -1) 📝 `src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalTab.cpp` (+6 -5) 📝 `src/cascadia/TerminalApp/TerminalTab.h` (+1 -1) </details> ### 📄 Description <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request Implementation of #6219 with a small tweak, not just passing the keys when no panes are present, but passing on the keys when there is no other pane to move to. This enables another usecase: 2 panes in terminal split vertically; in one of these panes running tmux with two panes that are split horizontally. This allows the user to still navigate between tmux panes even though they have terminal panes open. <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References Not that I know of <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #6219 * [x] CLA signed. * [x] Tests added/passed * [x] Documentation updated. I don't think that's necessary * [x] Schema updated. N/A * [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Implementation by propagating the boolean indicating success of moving focus all the way to the action handler, where this result will determine whether the action will be considered handled or not. When the action is not handled, the keychord will be propagated to the terminal. <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed Manual testing; all relevant unit tests still work --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
claunia added the pull-request label 2026-01-31 09:27:13 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
⛺ Reserved
A11yCO
A11yMAS
A11ySev1
A11ySev2
A11ySev3
A11yTTValidated
A11yUsable
A11yVoiceAccess
A11yWCAG
Area-Accessibility
Area-AtlasEngine
Area-AzureShell
Area-Build
Area-Build
Area-Chat
Area-CmdPal
Area-CodeHealth
Area-Commandline
Area-CookedRead
Area-DefApp
Area-Extensibility
Area-Fonts
Area-GroupPolicy
Area-i18n
Area-Input
Area-Interaction
Area-Interop
Area-Localization
Area-Output
Area-Performance
Area-Portable
Area-Quality
Area-Remoting
Area-Rendering
Area-Schema
Area-Server
Area-Settings
Area-SettingsUI
Area-ShellExtension
Area-ShellExtension
Area-ShellExtension
Area-Suggestions
Area-Suggestions
Area-TerminalConnection
Area-TerminalControl
Area-Theming
Area-UserInterface
Area-VT
Area-Windowing
Area-WPFControl
AutoMerge
Blocking-Ingestion
Culprit-Centennial
Culprit-WinUI
Disability-All
Disability-Blind
Disability-LowVision
Disability-Mobility
External-Blocked-WinUI3
Fixed
Gathering-Data
good first issue
HCL-E+D
HCL-WindowsTerminal
Help Wanted
Impact-Compatibility
Impact-Compliance
Impact-Correctness
Impact-Visual
In-PR
InclusionBacklog
InclusionBacklog-Windows TerminalWin32
InclusionCommitted-202206
Issue-Bug
Issue-Docs
Issue-Feature
Issue-Feature
Issue-Question
Issue-Samples
Issue-Scenario
Issue-Task
Needs-Attention
Needs-Author-Feedback
Needs-Bisect
Needs-Discussion
Needs-Repro
Needs-Tag-Fix
Needs-Tag-Fix
Needs-Triage
No-Recent-Activity
Priority-0
Priority-1
Priority-2
Priority-3
Product-Cmd.exe
Product-Colortool
Product-Colortool
Product-Colortool
Product-Conhost
Product-Conpty
Product-Meta
Product-Powershell
Product-Terminal
Product-WSL
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 Resolution-Answered
Resolution-By-Design
Resolution-Duplicate
Resolution-External
Resolution-Fix-Available
Resolution-Fix-Committed
Resolution-No-Repro
Resolution-Won't-Fix
Severity-Blocking
Severity-Crash
Severity-DataLoss
spam
this-will-be-a-breaking-change
Tracking-External
WindowsTerminal_Win32
Work-Item
zAskModeBug
zInbox-Bug
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
claunia
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/terminal#28238
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?