Unicode font rendering problem #3810

Closed
opened 2026-01-30 23:30:38 +00:00 by claunia · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @dotSlashLu on GitHub (Sep 10, 2019).

Originally assigned to: @DHowett-MSFT on GitHub.

Environment

Windows build number: Microsoft Windows [版本 10.0.18362.295]
Windows Terminal version (if applicable): 0.4.2382.0
Profile Font: Consolas

Any other software? 
Remote Linux box locale: en_US.UTF-8

Steps to reproduce

(Some of these steps might not be relevant)

  1. Open the debian WSL profile
  2. SSH to a remote Linux box
  3. Start a tmux session
  4. Edit a file which contains Chinese character and has lines more than the terminal using neovim
  5. Scroll through the lines in neovim

Expected behavior

The unicode(Chinese) characters' font size should be consistent and should not be duplicated.

snapshot

Actual behavior

When scrolling, by chances the Chinese characters get duplicated and the font get smaller than other normally rendered Chinese characters.

Originally created by @dotSlashLu on GitHub (Sep 10, 2019). Originally assigned to: @DHowett-MSFT on GitHub. # Environment ```none Windows build number: Microsoft Windows [版本 10.0.18362.295] Windows Terminal version (if applicable): 0.4.2382.0 Profile Font: Consolas Any other software? Remote Linux box locale: en_US.UTF-8 ``` # Steps to reproduce (Some of these steps might not be relevant) 1. Open the debian WSL profile 2. SSH to a remote Linux box 3. Start a tmux session 4. Edit a file which contains Chinese character and has lines more than the terminal using neovim 5. Scroll through the lines in neovim # Expected behavior The unicode(Chinese) characters' font size should be consistent and should not be duplicated. ![snapshot](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3133289/64590078-46c21800-d3d9-11e9-8b13-720a5b72492d.png) # Actual behavior When scrolling, by chances the Chinese characters get duplicated and the font get smaller than other normally rendered Chinese characters.
Author
Owner

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2019):

This looks similar to #610, but considering the duplicated characters I'm thinking it isn't the same thing.

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2019): This looks similar to #610, but considering the duplicated characters I'm thinking it isn't the same thing.
Author
Owner

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Sep 16, 2019):

I think there's a duplicate for this, so I'm assigning myself to find it.

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Sep 16, 2019): I think there's a duplicate for this, so I'm assigning myself to find it.
Author
Owner

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019):

/dup #610

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019): /dup #610
Author
Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019):

Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report!

@ghost commented on GitHub (Sep 27, 2019): Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report!
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/terminal#3810