switch acrylic effect to transparency when window is not focused #6213

Closed
opened 2026-01-31 00:32:34 +00:00 by claunia · 9 comments
Owner

Originally created by @ackvf on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020).

Description of the new feature/enhancement

Apparently the loss of acrylic transparency is an OS limitation.

Can we get good old transparency when the window is not focused and useAcrylic when focused?

From left
standard CMD with transparency, focused terminal, background terminal
image

Originally created by @ackvf on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020). <!-- 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING BEFORE PROCEEDING: 1. If I delete this entire template and go my own path, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 2. If I list multiple bugs/concerns in this one issue, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 3. If I write an issue that has many duplicates, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement (and without necessarily spending time to find the exact duplicate ID number). 4. If I leave the title incomplete when filing the issue, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. 5. If I file something completely blank in the body, the core team may close my issue without further explanation or engagement. All good? Then proceed! --> # Description of the new feature/enhancement <!-- A clear and concise description of what the problem is that the new feature would solve. Describe why and how a user would use this new functionality (if applicable). --> Apparently the loss of acrylic transparency is an OS limitation. Can we get good old transparency when the window is not focused and `useAcrylic` when focused? From left standard CMD with transparency, focused terminal, background terminal ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2313018/73467282-699e9a00-4383-11ea-9871-5c3ac6d29afe.png)
claunia added the Issue-FeatureResolution-Duplicate labels 2026-01-31 00:32:34 +00:00
Author
Owner

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020):

/dup #603

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020): /dup #603
Author
Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020):

Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report!

@ghost commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020): Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report!
Author
Owner

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020):

I know you specified “when not focused,” but the engineering work required is the same as 603. :)

@DHowett-MSFT commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020): I know you specified “when not focused,” but the engineering work required is the same as 603. :)
Author
Owner

@ackvf commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020):

@DHowett-MSFT Thank you, I was focused on the Acrylic transparency so much that I have missed that.
There also already is a feature-request to have different config for focused and unfocused so I guess this issue is perfectly covered by the two.

@ackvf commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020): @DHowett-MSFT Thank you, I was focused on the Acrylic transparency so much that I have missed that. There also already is a feature-request to have different config for focused and unfocused so I guess this issue is perfectly covered by the two.
Author
Owner

@admered1 commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020):

I am a Linux native and miss the gnome-terminal transparency. The idea is to see through one or more of the terminals to the windows underneath. If the focused window goes fuzzy, this defeats the whole purpose.

@admered1 commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2020): I am a Linux native and miss the gnome-terminal transparency. The idea is to see through one or more of the terminals to the windows underneath. If the focused window goes fuzzy, this defeats the whole purpose.
Author
Owner

@b-hayes commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

Totally agree with @admered1 I really don't care for acrylic it has no use.
I want plain transparency so that I can read the text behind my terminal as I am typing. That's the whole point to transparent terminal IMO.

Ideally tho I'd use acrylic if there was only an ever so slight blur such that I can still read the text behind but the terminal text is still clearer. (what I do on macOS have very slight blur and it works really well. Would love this on windows too)

@b-hayes commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): Totally agree with @admered1 I really don't care for acrylic it has no use. I want plain transparency so that I can read the text behind my terminal as I am typing. That's the whole point to transparent terminal IMO. Ideally tho I'd use acrylic if there was only an ever so slight blur such that I can still read the text behind but the terminal text is still clearer. (what I do on macOS have very slight blur and it works really well. Would love this on windows too)
Author
Owner

@Sollace commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2021):

Agreeing with @admered1 here as well. What's more, the way Acrylic is just completely stupid. It makes the text on the terminal window hard to read right when I'm trying to use it, then makes the window fully opaque when I'm trying to see through it.

The whole concept of Acrylic as a thing is just completely flawed.

@Sollace commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2021): Agreeing with @admered1 here as well. What's more, the way Acrylic is just completely stupid. It makes the text on the terminal window hard to read right when I'm trying to use it, then makes the window fully opaque when I'm trying to see through it. The whole concept of Acrylic as a thing is just completely flawed.
Author
Owner

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2021):

@Sollace k. Thanks for sharing your opinion. Might I interest you in unblurred opacity instead? That was tracked in #603 (which this thread was linked to), and added in #11180.

@zadjii-msft commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2021): @Sollace [k](https://c.tenor.com/CkASCfIfaWIAAAAd/the-dude-yeah-well-you-know-thats-just-like-your-opinion-man.gif). Thanks for sharing your opinion. Might I interest you in unblurred opacity instead? That was tracked in #603 (which this thread was linked to), and added in #11180.
Author
Owner

@Sollace commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2021):

@zadjii-msft Oh, haha. Thank you! Sorry! I had just seen that after commenting.

Good to see there's some work being done on this. When I installed it recently I only got 1.11.2921.0, and so thought this feature had still not been worked on.

@Sollace commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2021): @zadjii-msft Oh, haha. Thank you! Sorry! I had just seen that after commenting. Good to see there's some work being done on this. When I installed it recently I only got 1.11.2921.0, and so thought this feature had still not been worked on.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/terminal#6213