mirror of
https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor.git
synced 2026-02-03 21:23:48 +00:00
[PR #1557] [CLOSED] [FEAT] Add net module in lib_ccxr
#2275
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
📋 Pull Request Information
Original PR: https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/pull/1557
Author: @elbertronnie
Created: 8/27/2023
Status: ❌ Closed
Base:
master← Head:add-net-module📝 Commits (5)
8014d8bcreate lib_ccxr and libccxr_exports8f348feadd log module49cdd1fadd time units module6db74b7Merge branch 'add-log-module'9ef9fc7add net module📊 Changes
24 files changed (+3517 additions, -63 deletions)
View changed files
📝
.gitignore(+2 -1)📝
src/lib_ccx/lib_ccx.c(+8 -0)📝
src/lib_ccx/networking.c(+54 -0)📝
src/lib_ccx/utility.c(+33 -0)📝
src/rust/Cargo.lock(+332 -61)📝
src/rust/Cargo.toml(+1 -0)📝
src/rust/build.rs(+8 -1)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/Cargo.lock(+354 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/Cargo.toml(+23 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/lib.rs(+1 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/log.rs(+546 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/mod.rs(+5 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/net/c_functions.rs(+95 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/net/common.rs(+353 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/net/mod.rs(+42 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/net/source.rs(+309 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/net/target.rs(+276 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/time/c_functions.rs(+35 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/time/mod.rs(+27 -0)➕
src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/util/time/units.rs(+634 -0)...and 4 more files
📄 Description
In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):
My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):
This is an attempt to split #1495 into multiple independant PRs. Dependant on #1551, #1556 and #1553.
This PR adds networking primitives to send and receive captions across the internet. The networking functions are integrated into C codebase.
NOTE: I was able to test the TCP implementation but I could check if the UDP implementation is correct or not, since there is no way to send caption through UDP.
🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.