[PR #1785] Fix #1779: Update COMPILATION.md to reflect correct Linux build flags #2522

Closed
opened 2026-01-29 17:22:34 +00:00 by claunia · 0 comments
Owner

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/pull/1785

State: closed
Merged: No


Problem
The Linux build script (ccextractor/linux/build) does not support the -without-rust flag, yet the documentation suggested it could be used:
./build -without-rust
./build -debug -without-rust

This caused confusion because the build script only supports:
-debug
-hardsubx

Meanwhile, the --without-rust option does exist, but only in the autoconf-based workflow (./configure --without-rust).

🔧 Changes Made

  • Removed all incorrect references to ./build -without-rust
  • Removed the incorrect combined example ./build -debug -without-rust
  • Clarified that --without-rust is a valid option only for autoconf builds
  • Updated COMPILATION.md to accurately reflect supported flags
**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/CCExtractor/ccextractor/pull/1785 **State:** closed **Merged:** No --- ✅ Problem The Linux build script (ccextractor/linux/build) does not support the -without-rust flag, yet the documentation suggested it could be used: ./build -without-rust ./build -debug -without-rust This caused confusion because the build script only supports: -debug -hardsubx Meanwhile, the --without-rust option does exist, but only in the autoconf-based workflow (./configure --without-rust). 🔧 Changes Made - Removed all incorrect references to ./build -without-rust - Removed the incorrect combined example ./build -debug -without-rust - Clarified that --without-rust is a valid option only for autoconf builds - Updated COMPILATION.md to accurately reflect supported flags
claunia added the pull-request label 2026-01-29 17:22:34 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/ccextractor#2522